Other historians also argue that the fact that many parts of
Equiano's account can be proven lends weight to accepting his account of
African birth. As historian Adam Hochschild
has written: "In the long and fascinating history of autobiographies
that distort or exaggerate the truth. ...Seldom is one crucial portion
of a memoir totally fabricated and the remainder scrupulously accurate;
among autobiographers... both dissemblers and truth-tellers tend to be
consistent."[28]
He also noted that "since the ‘rediscovery’ of Vassa’s account in the
1960s, ‘scholars have valued it as the most extensive account of an
eighteenth-century slave’s life’ and the difficult passage from slavery
to freedom."[4]
In her book on Equiano and what she says are his Igbo origins, Nigerian writer Catherine Obianuju Acholonu wrote in 1989 that he was born in a Nigerian town known as Isseke, where she said local oral history told of his upbringing.[29]
In his 1991 review of her work, O.S. Ogede criticized the lack of
intellectual rigor and noted serious errors in her research, beginning
with how she determined Isseke as the village of origin and claimed she
saw people with features traditionally associated with his family,
although he had left there 250 years ago. He also criticized her effort
to determine Equiano's origins based on analysis of language that she
interpreted through his transcriptions. He argued for the memoir being
considered "literary biography" and noted that she did not refer to the
current debate on whether Equiano's account "should be considered
fiction or fact."[7]
many historians debating/arguing around Equaino autobiography because the incidents which he mentioned on his book does not correspond with time,due to the fact that he was sold to slave trade at an early age,so according to psychology when you are a child,there is some information you remove and replace it with the one you think its good for you.
ReplyDelete